Wk 11 (2nd Discussion) Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Wk 11 (2nd Discussion) - Article Exampleis really about questioning the legitimacy of something regarded as fact, and this perspective should be adapted and not disregarded if one aspires to grow in truthful information.One way to interact with information is by delving deeper into its research basis. If a claim is made, one should ask, What scientific research supports such claims? (Pope, 1998). If none can be provided, then this claim can be pink-slipped as mere hearsay, or looking at it as a challenge, is a statement which can fuel a research study to be conducted to read whether it is true or not. If a research study is provided as a support though, then it is but proper and fitting to scrutinize the instruments and methods apply in gathering and analyzing data. For example, if s survey questionnaire was given out by a psychologist to the respondents, validity of the tool should first be established to stop that the questions impart not bring about bias to the study or it s hould undergo face and content validation by experts in the field first to ensure that the questions are not leading towards specific results. This should be done since the anomalies may be rooted foremost in the methodology, which also paved way for ridiculous conclusions.Now, the aforementioned approach can be likened to the scrutiny of the branches of a plant. Another way to determine the accuracy of information is to examine closely vague and double terms. Repressed memories of sexual abuse during childhood have been studied by many, but the definition of repressed memories has been haphazardly used by in media, books and in legal proceedings. A gray area has clouded the vivid demarcation of whether repressed memories are figments of the unconscious defense mechanisms or whether it is a plot of forgetting (Pope, 1998). Defining terms and allotting which definition is described in which study can provide a much clearer way of assimilating information, and a way to determine